引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】 【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 163次   下载 30 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
变循环发动机外涵道气流掺混特性建模研究
吴宋伟,田杰,张天宏,李凌蔚,李佳翱
南京航空航天大学 能源与动力学院,江苏 南京 210016
摘要:
模式选择活门和前涵道引射器作为变循环发动机的关键几何部件,用于改善发动机在稳态以及模式切换过程的部件匹配性能,针对两者开度对外涵道气流掺混总压损失的影响开展研究。采用二维数值模拟方法,对内部压缩系统流场进行了仿真分析,得到了气流掺混的总压恢复系数在模式选择活门和前涵道引射器不同开度下的变化规律。以数值仿真结果作为建模研究的数据集,提出一种基于贝叶斯优化的混合核极限学习机算法,建立了总压恢复系数映射模型,采用留一交叉验证方法对模型进行了评估。结果表明,本文所提出的核极限学习机算法的均方根误差为0.0094,泛化效果相比多元线性回归模型提升约70.6%以上,所建拟合模型预测的相对误差最大不超过1.57%。
关键词:  变循环发动机  前涵道引射器  模式选择活门  气流掺混  总压恢复系数  贝叶斯优化  混合核极限学习机
DOI:10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210546
分类号:V233.7
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51976089)。
Modeling Research on Bypass Flow Mixing Characteristics of Variable Cycle Engine
WU Song-wei, TIAN Jie, ZHANG Tian-hong, LI Ling-wei, LI Jia-ao
College of Energy and Power,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
Abstract:
The mode selector valve and the forward bypass ejector are the key geometric components of the variable cycle engine, which are used to improve the engine’s component matching performance in the steady-state and the mode transitioning process. Research is carried out on the influence of the two openings on the total pressure loss of the bypass flow mixing. A two-dimensional numerical simulation method was used, and the flow field of the internal compression system was simulated and analyzed. The change rule of the total pressure recovery ratio of flow mixing under different openings of the mode selector valve and the forward bypass ejector was obtained. Numerical simulation results were used as the data set for modeling research. A hybrid kernel extreme learning machine algorithm based on Bayesian optimization was proposed, and the total pressure recovery ratio mapping model was established. The leave-one-out cross-validation method was used to evaluate the model. The root mean square error of the kernel extreme learning machine algorithm proposed in this paper is 0.0094, and the generalization effect is improved by more than 70.6% compared with the multiple linear regression model. The relative error predicted by the fitting model is no more than 1.57%.
Key words:  Variable cycle engine  Forward bypass injector  Mode selector valve  Air flow mixing  Total pressure recovery ratio  Bayesian optimization  Hybrid nuclear extreme learning machine