引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】 【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1350次   下载 0 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
典型布局的进气道/导弹一体化性能分析
蒋妮1, 王永卫1, 凌文辉2, 王健2
1.中国航天科工集团三十一研究所,北京 100074;2.中国航天科工集团三十一研究所 高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室,北京 100074
摘要:
对头部进气、颌下进气、二元(两侧)进气三种典型布局的进气道/弹体一体化性能进行了计算,就阻力系数而言,颌下及头部进气优于两侧进气,升力系数则恰好相反。头部进气的流量系数最高,颌下次之,两侧进气则最差。对不同布局的总压恢复系数进行比较,颌下及两侧进气则较头部进气有好的攻角特性。
关键词:  进气道  弹体  一体化设计  性能
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Integration performance analysis of typical arrangement inlet/missile
JIANG Ni1, WANG Yong-wei1, LING Wen-hui2, WANG Jian2
1.The 31st Research Inst. of CASIC, Beijing 100074, China;2.Science and Technology onScramjet Lab.,The 31st Research Inst. of CASIC,Beijing 100074,China
Abstract:
This thesis calculates integration performance of frontal inlet, chin inlet, two-dimensional inlet and missile. According to the drag coefficient, chin inlet and frontal inlet are superior to two-dimensional inlet, but the lift coefficient is the opposite. The inlet mass-flow coefficient of frontal inlet is the best, the flow coefficient of two-dimensional inlet is the lowest. By comparison of inlet total pressure recovery coefficient, attack-angle performance of chin inlet and two-dimensional inlet are superior to frontal inlet. 
Key words:  Inlet  Missile body  Integration design  Performance